You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have an SBOM that fails to import into DT as it says that it is invalid.
I have access to a validation tool that states the SBOM is valid.
I have actually had this before and eventually proved that it actually was invalid, fixed it and uploaded it into DT.
My question is, why does this 'error' in the SBOM not show in the DT Logs. Some time ago, this sort of information did show in the logs. For example, I remember a blank component name not being imported into DT and the log showed the issue.
Now there is nothing. Is this deliberate or should this information be logged?
It would certainly make identifying the issue significantly easier if which entry was at issue was captured in the logs. Thanks
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The title is slightly misleading.
I have an SBOM that fails to import into DT as it says that it is invalid.
I have access to a validation tool that states the SBOM is valid.
I have actually had this before and eventually proved that it actually was invalid, fixed it and uploaded it into DT.
My question is, why does this 'error' in the SBOM not show in the DT Logs. Some time ago, this sort of information did show in the logs. For example, I remember a blank component name not being imported into DT and the log showed the issue.
Now there is nothing. Is this deliberate or should this information be logged?
It would certainly make identifying the issue significantly easier if which entry was at issue was captured in the logs. Thanks
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions