Replies: 2 comments
-
@soehlerSF Thanks for your question. Since it is strictly spoken not an issue with NVDA, I converted it to a discussion. The reason why I believe so is that NVDA in most situations just announces what it is told to do so by the Browser. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Let's redirect conversation back to #18642 for now. Can you share there what the concern clients have with NVDA reading "document"? Screen readers vary in behaviour and users prefer a variety of different verbosity levels. The behaviour of NVDA evolves over time, and depends on a large amount of user configuration. It's not extremely feasible for us to maintain thorough public documentation of exactly everything NVDA does, particularly to this level. I think this behaviour can be toggled off by "report articles" if you wish to disable it. In #18642, can you please let us know:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
No problem in particular: we are a software-as-a-service that provides capabilities for customers to create their own lightning components. Sometimes customers will configure a component that, when tabbed to (or focused), NVDA will read out 'document'. We're unable to provide a reproduction of this, but we suspect that it has to do with the presence of the html element
<article>
in relation to other elements where focus is passing from one article to another. We're unable to reproduce this consistently.Describe the solution you'd like
We're hoping NVDA can update their documentation to indicate under what specific circumstances 'document' is read aloud, with emphasis on what configuration causes this to occur and with what elements. The reason this is important is because customers are comparing this product with the functionality of MacVO (for OS and browser consistency in testing) and MacVO does not seem to announce document focus swaps like NVDA does, so a better understanding of what technically causes this announcement would be of great help.
Describe alternatives you've considered
n/a
Additional context
n/a
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions