Replies: 1 comment
-
Thanks a lot for the great feedback @comods . It's true that packages have been not getting a lot of love since uniting the both websites. We'll work on those things in the coming quarter, please stay tuned and keep the feedback coming. It helps us immensely |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
wapm.io was great, worked, simple, and ran embedded runtimes.
wasmer.io is way worse, broken, confusing, ugly, and unusable.
Where is the mobile type-able url that takes you to a clean package search? Used to be wapm.io (7 chars) and now there isn't one.
It looks and runs like it was made by an outdated AI prompt:
Your CLI tools are great, just please give us a working website, like wapm.io was.
Focus on getting traffic to packages or no one has a use for wasmer.io/explore.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions