Skip to content

Define measurement method for compatibility with Unitful.jl #36

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 19, 2019

Conversation

giordano
Copy link
Member

Fix #35

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Apr 18, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #36 into master will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #36      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.58%   96.61%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files           9        9              
  Lines         527      531       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits          509      513       +4     
  Misses         18       18
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/show.jl 75% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
src/Measurements.jl 91.66% <100%> (+1.66%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 35394d9...e0d51fd. Read the comment docs.

@giordano giordano merged commit 1e1f580 into master Apr 19, 2019
@giordano giordano deleted the unitful branch April 19, 2019 10:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Feature Request: Allow for More Flexible Unitful.jl Constructions
2 participants