Add Privacy Guard NER engine - #24
Draft
johnnygreco wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
Documentation previewBuilt from |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
nerentity-processing engine with policy-owned labels, threshold, overlap behavior, and deterministic replacementNERModelfacade with explicit/v1/extractand serialized local-model implementationsWhy
Privacy Guard needs general named-entity recognition without coupling policy to a model checkpoint, endpoint, or execution location. This preserves the existing engine boundary while allowing operators to deploy the same policy against a remote GLiNER-compatible endpoint or an already-loaded local model.
Validation
make check— 297 passed, 2 explicitly opt-in live-model smoke tests skippedmake check-py311python3 tests/test_render_dev_notes.pyscripts/build-docs.shNotes
The live DGX endpoint and local downloaded-model smoke tests remain opt-in through explicit environment variables; normal validation never contacts or downloads a model.