Skip to content

Update supportsInlineConcurrentLinkedQueue to check for CTX #20413

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2024

Conversation

r30shah
Copy link
Contributor

@r30shah r30shah commented Oct 25, 2024

Check is Constrained Transactional Execution feature supported on the CPU to inline ConcurrentLinkedQueue.tmOffer/Poll. Check if CPU has support for Transactional Exuecution feature which covers non constrained TM as well in addition to environment flag is set to generate non constrainedTM sequence for tmOffer and tmPoll.

@r30shah r30shah force-pushed the TXCFlag branch 2 times, most recently from b649d86 to cb4b651 Compare November 5, 2024 02:48
@r30shah r30shah marked this pull request as ready for review November 5, 2024 02:48
Check is Constrained Transactional Execution feature supported on the
CPU to inline ConcurrentLinkedQueue.tmOffer/Poll. Check if CPU has
support for Transactional Exuecution feature which covers non
constrained TM as well in addition to environment flag is set to
generate non constrainedTM sequence for tmOffer and tmPoll.

Signed-off-by: Rahil Shah <[email protected]>
@r30shah
Copy link
Contributor Author

r30shah commented Nov 12, 2024

@joransiu Can I please get your review on this change ?

I have tested the change internally with IBM SDK 8 build and also verified it with the CLQ benchmark to ensure the acceleration.

Copy link
Member

@joransiu joransiu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@joransiu
Copy link
Member

Jenkins test sanity zlinux jdk23

@joransiu joransiu merged commit 842c72c into eclipse-openj9:master Nov 13, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants