-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
[FDC] Simplify init flow for Spark projects #8983
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @fredzqm, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request streamlines the initialization process for Spark projects by optimizing the API enablement flow. Instead of unconditionally enabling several APIs, the system now first checks if the core Data Connect API is already enabled. If it is, it proceeds with ensuring other necessary APIs and prompting for existing services; otherwise, it simplifies the initial setup by only writing the template, reducing setup time for new projects where the API might not yet be active.
Highlights
- Optimized API Initialization: The ensureApis function now conditionally checks if the Data Connect API is already enabled using a new isApiEnabled function, preventing redundant API enablement calls during project initialization.
- Reduced API Dependencies: The computeOrigin API is no longer ensured as part of the general ensureApis flow, simplifying the required API set for Data Connect projects.
- Refactored Setup Logic: The askQuestions function in the Data Connect initialization feature has been updated to incorporate the new conditional API checks, leading to a more efficient and responsive setup experience.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request simplifies the init
flow for Spark projects by checking for API enablement upfront. If APIs are not enabled, it triggers the enablement process in the background to improve the user experience, which is a great enhancement. My main feedback is to add error handling for this background task to prevent unhandled promise rejections that could crash the application.
await ensureApis(setup.projectId); | ||
info = await promptForExistingServices(setup, info); | ||
} else { | ||
void ensureApis(setup.projectId); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Using void
to fire-and-forget this promise is a good way to speed up the init
flow. However, if the ensureApis
promise rejects (for example, due to permissions or billing issues), it will result in an unhandled promise rejection, which can crash the Node.js process.
It's safer to attach a .catch()
handler to log the error for debugging purposes without blocking the main execution thread.
ensureApis(setup.projectId).catch((err) => {
// Log for debugging, but don't block the init flow.
logger.debug(`[dataconnect] Background API enablement failed: ${err.message}`);
});
For newly created project
Old behavior: Enable a few APIs (take a while), then write the free trial template.

New behavior: If FDC API wasn't enabled, just write the template and exist.