feat(genai): add support for thought_signature in image content blocks#1838
Open
Maciej Nachtygal (nhtgl) wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
feat(genai): add support for thought_signature in image content blocks#1838Maciej Nachtygal (nhtgl) wants to merge 1 commit into
Maciej Nachtygal (nhtgl) wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Maciej Nachtygal (nhtgl)
force-pushed
the
main
branch
from
June 12, 2026 10:56
1b21347 to
ff4f136
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Gemini image generation models return a thought_signature alongside generated images. This signature must be sent back in subsequent requests for multi-turn image refinement — without it, the API rejects the request with INVALID_ARGUMENT: Image part is missing a thought_signature.
Two bugs prevented this from working:
Both paths are now fixed: inline base64 images and file URI images correctly round-trip their thought_signature through content_blocks.
Relevant issues
#1837
Type
🐛 Bug Fix
Changes(optional)
Testing(optional)
New unit tests in tests/unit_tests/test_chat_models.py:
Integration tested manually against gemini-3-pro-image using the repro script from the issue — Turn 2 now succeeds.
Note(optional)
The issue also mentions skip_thought_signature_validator as a fallback. This PR does not add that — if the signature is present in content_blocks, it will be sent; if not (e.g. older messages), the caller is responsible. Addressing the validator flag is a separate concern.