-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
CHANGELOG: document breaking change of runc update #4848
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
9be623a
to
660f505
Compare
CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
original container spec did not include linux.intelRdt. Without intelRdt in | ||
the spec, no CLOS (resctrl group) is created for the container, so these | ||
options cannot be properly applied. (#4827) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since this is a breaking change entry in the changelog, it would be nice for this last sentence (explaining why the breaking change was necessary / that the original feature didn't work) to be a little bit longer.
Also, we tend to refer to the initial configuration as config.json
directly in runc docs.
Something like
original container spec did not include linux.intelRdt. Without intelRdt in | |
the spec, no CLOS (resctrl group) is created for the container, so these | |
options cannot be properly applied. (#4827) | |
original `config.json` did not include `linux.intelRdt`. | |
The reason for this change is that if `linux.intelRdt` is missing | |
from `config.json` when the container was created, no CLOS (resctrl | |
group) will be created, and so it is not possible to apply the | |
updated options with `runc update`. | |
Previously, runc would **FILL IN WITH PREVIOUS RUNC BEHAVIOUR AND | |
HOW IT WAS BROKEN**. (#4827) |
(This also includes @lifubang's suggestion.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated, a slightly less verbose version
Co-authored-by: lfbzhm <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <[email protected]>
660f505
to
562e5db
Compare
No description provided.