-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.5k
docs: fix dead links to kenreitz.org #6951
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@duzhuoshanwai perhaps you could take a look since you most recently touched this documentation? Thanks! |
Or maybe @nateprewitt who reviewed #6899 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
At this point I'd prefer we just remove these links. We get PRs every few years whenever the domain changes.
Shouldn't we asking kennethreitz himself, since this is his website? |
Co-authored-by: Nate Prewitt <[email protected]>
I think there's some useful information in both of those remaining links. Maybe I try to paraphrase or summarize to include them directly on the docs site? |
Be cordial or be on your way, isn't a code of conduct and being under the PSF we adhere to that. We should instead link to that CoC |
Also the post about the future from 13 years ago, isn't relevant any longer. We just haven't edited and pruned our docs in a long while to remove references to it |
Thanks for the feedback! Indeed, as I look deeper into the Transport Adapters justification, it doesn't appear that the original vision of unifying WGSI, Flask, Requests, etc. with common base classes wasn't actually achieved, so that document may be doing more harm than good at this point. Removed both of the remaining links in 6716d7c |
I noticed a few dead links. Looking back through the wayback machine, I was able to find the new location of these articles.