Are these metrics expected for these cases?
f1.py:
h1: 0
h2: 0
N1: 0
N2: 0
vocabulary: 0
length: 0
calculated_length: 0
volume: 0
difficulty: 0
effort: 0
time: 0.0
bugs: 0.0
f2.py:
h1: 1
h2: 2
N1: 1
N2: 2
vocabulary: 3
length: 3
calculated_length: 2.0
volume: 4.754887502163469
difficulty: 0.5
effort: 2.3774437510817346
time: 0.1320802083934297
bugs: 0.0015849625007211565
f3.py:
h1: 2
h2: 4
N1: 2
N2: 4
vocabulary: 6
length: 6
calculated_length: 10.0
volume: 15.509775004326936
difficulty: 1.0
effort: 15.509775004326936
time: 0.861654166907052
bugs: 0.005169925001442312
Cases:
./f1.py
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
class A:
a = 1
b = 2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
./f2.py
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
class A:
a = 1
b = 2
def main():
pass
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
./f3.py
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
class A:
a = 1
b = 2
def add(self):
return self.a + self.b
def main():
pass
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
I guess I don't understand why I'm getting zeros there. An actual pretty complex code that I checked yielded hal metrics with values as 0 and that was surprising to me.
I understand that the code that gets 0 actually does not run anything, but still, it's surprising to me.
Are these metrics expected for these cases?
Cases:
I guess I don't understand why I'm getting zeros there. An actual pretty complex code that I checked yielded
halmetrics with values as0and that was surprising to me.I understand that the code that gets
0actually does not run anything, but still, it's surprising to me.