'UPPER_LIMIT_CFGI' vs 'CONTINUOUS_FROZEN_GROUND_INDEX_UPPER_LIMIT' in control file #43
Description
A user reports:
I'm running a recent version of the SWB code and it has been giving me a warning that I am not supplying the limits for the continuous frozen ground index, and that it is setting it to default values of 56 and 83. I have these specified both in the control file and as columns in the land use lookup table as:
CONTINUOUS_FROZEN_GROUND_INDEX_UPPER_LIMIT 83.
CONTINUOUS_FROZEN_GROUND_INDEX_LOWER_LIMIT 55.
Doh.
That's because the error message refers to 'CONTINUOUS_FROZEN_GROUND_INDEX_UPPER_LIMIT', while internally the code refers to 'UPPER_LIMIT_CFGI'. Likewise, the error message refers to 'CONTINUOUS_FROZEN_GROUND_INDEX_LOWER_LIMIT', while the code refers to 'LOWER_LIMIT_CFGI'.