chore(deps): update dependency @rsbuild/plugin-sass to v2

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Adoption	Passing	Confidence
@rsbuild/plugin-sass (source)	^1.5.3 → ^2.0.0

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

web-infra-dev/rsbuild (@​rsbuild/plugin-sass)

v2.0.0

Compare Source

Breaking changes

• feat(plugin-sass)!: publish as pure ESM by @​chenjiahan in #​7956
• feat(plugin-sass)!: drop Rsbuild v1 support by @​chenjiahan in #​7958

Other changes

• chore: add bugs metadata to remaining plugin packages by @​killernova in #​7935
• chore(deps): update sass to ^1.101.0 by @​renovate in #​7897
• chore(deps): upgrade reduce-configs catalog to v2 by @​chenjiahan in #​7960

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (in timezone Asia/Shanghai)

• Branch creation
  • "before 8am on saturday"
• Automerge
  • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

[cloudflare-workers-and-pages]

Deploying rspack with    Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit:	12f0132
Status:	✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL:	https://98bbd52b.rspack-v2.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL:	https://renovate-rsbuild-plugin-sass.rspack-v2.pages.dev

View logs

[github-actions]

📦 Binary Size-limit

Comparing 12f0132 to chore(deps): update dependency @ast-grep/napi to ^0.44.0 (#14596) by renovate[bot]

🙈 Size remains the same at 67.88MB

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 41 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 47 skipped benchmarks¹

---

_{Comparing renovate/rsbuild-plugin-sass-2.x (12f0132) with main (e035640)²}

Footnotes

1. 47 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

2. No successful run was found on main (fc3de9c) during the generation of this report, so e035640 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩